lol even when given an answer that you guys have been seeking you still complain.
It is simply not a reasonable explanation. I doubt there is anything legally binding to prevent them from releasing this information since Ewert null and voided any contract by trying to slide manipulated books through the system. If Ewert was going to sue he would have done it when CGC asked him to get out of the industry.
In the end they would not be disseminating any vital personal info they could just release a group of numbers and since the guy who submitted it voided his rights and is no longer in the industry there is little harm it could do. In fact I think releasing this data to the public would be more beneficial than harmful.
Anyway ... all I am saying is that they are simply not dealing with this situation very well. They should be doing better. Especially in light of the fact that Haspel's, I believe, criticism of the NOD's attempt to get the information out in the open. If they want to keep handling each situation like this they are going to do more harm to themselves than any critic could.
CGC isn't going to do any harm to themselves either way. Submissions are up -- they had an extremely strong show in NYC. They handled the Ewert situation and guess what -- I would wager that the overwhelming majority either a) didn't care or b) approved of it or c) didn't approve but still want to submit.
Translation -- the criticism falls on mostly deaf ears.
Did you say something?
No.
btw: I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with the stance, just that this is a dead horse -- and no matter how much verbiage is spewed on the boards, it has been made very clear that there will be no change in the CGC policy. And since the overwhelming majority of people don't seem to care any more -- and it's the same few people posting -- I doubt we will see any change in their stance.
_________________________
Magnificent 7? I cannot confirm or deny its existence.
