Originally Posted By: DrWatson
 Originally Posted By: namisgr
 Originally Posted By: DrWatson
The term "original owner" really doesn't mean anything anymore. It is nothing more than a sales tool.


Don't mean to single out one small aspect of your position, Jim, but this one hits close to home and so I wanted to address it.

The term "original owner" means everything to some collectors. That is, when it is used in the appropriate context. I've started to sell off books that I bought off the rack back in the day. Being the original owner, and having left the books unmanipulated, I can say with absolute certainty to the buying public that these books are unmanipulated.

While I recognize that this doesn't mean anything to many collectors, there are at least a few who prefer to buy this type of collectible. So when certain sellers start each of their sales threads with the line "Yeah, yeah, like any other seller, any book I have may have been pressed", it is worthwhile to remember that they are wrong. There are, indeed, rare circumstances under which a seller can unconditionally guarantee that the books they are offering are unmanipulated. In this case, rather than the term "original owner" carrying no meaning, it instead carries a great deal of meaning, especially since the opportunities to buy guaranteed unmanipulated books are so infrequent.

No offense, Bob, but all we have is your word that you bought them off the news stand. I don't have any reason to believe you would lie, quite the contrary, but I have seen more than one seller do it here without any compunction whatsoever. So, for me, the OO designation holds very little weight.

I also see it as away of saying, "buy me, press me" without the seller having to come right out and say that. Therefore satisfying both ends of the buying and selling spectrum and still being able to hold common ground with both sides and everyone marginally happy.


Watson;

If I may be so bold, can I ask you a personal question? \(thumbs u

How long have you been collecting and are you a collector of comic books or are you only interested if you can flip the books for more money?

Just asking since your last paragraph seems to clearly be from the mindset of a dealer/speculator/investor as opposed to a true collector. Nothing wrong with being one or the other, but probably the source of much of the debate here.

If I buy a book from a true OO collection, I would be buying it for the integrity, originality, and history of the book and I would most certainly want to keep it that way. The absolute last thing on my mind would be to juiced it up and bastardized it (whether it be through pressing, micro-trimming, or what have you) just so I could sell it for a few more dollars.

I guess collectors are in the game for the books themselves while the non-collectors only real interest in the books are to generate more money in their pockets.

Again, nothing wrong with either, but may explain why the viewpoints are so divergent. hm