The point of this thread was to point out in the insufficiency and of CGC's response so far. Questions remain as to: 1) Why does CGC refuse to release a list of books that it believes are suspect (by virtue of being submitted by this person)? 2) Why does CGC not "proactively" contact registry set owners of the suspected books? 3) Why did CGC limits its offer of reviewing books to the time period noted? 4) Do they have any reason to believe that this person did not a) submit books through other people or b) that books sold by this person are not also suspect of having been trimmed?
Indeed. I would also like to know if CGC is applying the methods they use to detect Ewert's trimming technique on every book they examine and not just the books submitted by Ewert. I would assume they do but am not sure.
_________________________ "Get over it, " --Dale Roberts
