#5599395 - 04/13/1211:43 PMRe: PROBATION THREAD - for forum sales problems
[Re: sufunk]
skypinkbluskypinkblu I'm just the coordinator. Just?
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 07/01/05
Posts: 15433
Loc: WESTCHESTER NY (like the X-Men...
Originally Posted By: sufunk
Originally Posted By: oakman29
Originally Posted By: Bio-Rupp
Originally Posted By: oakman29
How would we go about locking the thread from the general population,and only five people having access to it? Would we need to ask Arch for moderator status only in the probie thread?
I've said this before... if you're going to involve Arch or Mods, just ask them to LOCK the words "PROBATION LIST" into the sig line of the offender.
Arch has proven that this lock of a sig line can be done. Then the offending party can't post anywhere without the brand of shame being evident.
Wouldn't be too hard either since there are only 50 or so HOS and Probation list members.
I think that is an excellent idea.
+1
That would be PERFECT!
That was suggested a long time ago... I thought it would make a nice custom title....it didn't seem to fly with the Mods.
GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE NOTICE ON POSTING GUIDELINES
Note that the members of this board are encouraged to POLITELY point out posts that violate the marketplace posting guidelines, and to notify the moderators.
Thread starters: If you disagree that the guidelines have been violated and have reasons, then take it to the discussion thread and hash it out there. But please take the time to read the guidelines.
A probation list for bad transactions is maintained by the community. You are still responsible for your own transactions.
#5599406 - 04/13/1211:46 PMRe: PROBATION THREAD - for forum sales problems
[Re: GreatGoogaMooga]
GreenGreen WHAT is your favorite color? Blue. No, Green! AAAAHHHHH!!!!
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 06/03/08
Posts: 12237
Loc: Begging AND Choosing
Originally Posted By: Povertyrow
Originally Posted By: divad
Originally Posted By: Povertyrow
Originally Posted By: oakman29
Originally Posted By: mikenyc
That's what's silly about the probation list; some clown can just take themselves off. It should be locked and only one member can update the list. There is someone I have in mind.
I agree 100% Since the probie list was Divads brain child I nominate him.
I have long felt the list itself should be locked in this way. I second Divad's nomination but think we need at least one other person (ideally two others) to insure realtime coverage, especially for things like hectic work days, being sick, going on vacation etc. It may also be good to have the other people in different time zones, maybe one on the East Coast and one in one of those odd European places. .
This is a good idea, but as my participation has been limited of late, I like POV's idea of having 4 or 5 authorized members. I'm fine with the three posters here and perhaps bosco as well? How about?
Povertyrow oakman29 mikenyc bosco divad
Thanks Divad but I would not want to be that involved anymore. As I had said a while back, "Pov doesn't work here anymore" and then my stripper vids were pulled. I do think you and a few others would be good for the list itself, because having it locked, which is part of the reason, would also prevent all the trash posts that keep littering it.
Looking at the posts centering on all of this and the mess the Probation List thread itself is in, I'm glad to be out of it.
Without moderator assistance it isnt worth the time or emotions.
_________________________
Looking for...Tales to astonish 67,77 and101 in 9.2....pm me
How would we go about locking the thread from the general population,and only five people having access to it? Would we need to ask Arch for moderator status only in the probie thread?
I've said this before... if you're going to involve Arch or Mods, just ask them to LOCK the words "PROBATION LIST" into the sig line of the offender.
Arch has proven that this lock of a sig line can be done. Then the offending party can't post anywhere without the brand of shame being evident.
Wouldn't be too hard either since there are only 50 or so HOS and Probation list members.
I think that is an excellent idea.
+1
That would be PERFECT!
That was suggested a long time ago... I thought it would make a nice custom title....it didn't seem to fly with the Mods.
It continues to amaze me that the Mods can consistantly pull a pic of a girl in a bathing suit or a slight political comment, but can't help enforce an issue that would actually protect board members.
Not saying that Mods aren't helpful or needed... just a
I think you've done a great job in these PL threads POV - I know you worked hard documenting all the rules. You've resisted taking the easy road on some nominations, when opposing the mob was the right thing to do. You always state your reasoning clearly yet you are very open minded when considering the opinions of others.
Registered: 09/14/02
Posts: 23426
Loc: Perv Toy Row, San Francisco, C...
Originally Posted By: Bio-Rupp
Originally Posted By: skypinkblu
Originally Posted By: sufunk
Originally Posted By: oakman29
Originally Posted By: Bio-Rupp
Originally Posted By: oakman29
How would we go about locking the thread from the general population,and only five people having access to it? Would we need to ask Arch for moderator status only in the probie thread?
I've said this before... if you're going to involve Arch or Mods, just ask them to LOCK the words "PROBATION LIST" into the sig line of the offender.
Arch has proven that this lock of a sig line can be done. Then the offending party can't post anywhere without the brand of shame being evident.
Wouldn't be too hard either since there are only 50 or so HOS and Probation list members.
I think that is an excellent idea.
+1
That would be PERFECT!
That was suggested a long time ago... I thought it would make a nice custom title....it didn't seem to fly with the Mods.
It continues to amaze me that the Mods can consistantly pull a pic of a girl in a bathing suit or a slight political comment, but can't help enforce an issue that would actually protect board members.
Not saying that Mods aren't helpful or needed... just a
This has been discussed before. There is a huge difference between maintaining the contents of the boards (removing photos etc) and branding individual users with negative siglines and/or custom titles. Why should CGC put themselves in such a potentially actionable position?
How would we go about locking the thread from the general population,and only five people having access to it? Would we need to ask Arch for moderator status only in the probie thread?
I've said this before... if you're going to involve Arch or Mods, just ask them to LOCK the words "PROBATION LIST" into the sig line of the offender.
Arch has proven that this lock of a sig line can be done. Then the offending party can't post anywhere without the brand of shame being evident.
Wouldn't be too hard either since there are only 50 or so HOS and Probation list members.
Never gonna happen . . . unless you agree to wear a Scarlet A
If you thought about it for more than 10 seconds (which I know is an eternity of consideration for most of you ) it would be sponsored "branding" - not necessarily a liability that the host company would like to incur.
How would we go about locking the thread from the general population,and only five people having access to it? Would we need to ask Arch for moderator status only in the probie thread?
I've said this before... if you're going to involve Arch or Mods, just ask them to LOCK the words "PROBATION LIST" into the sig line of the offender.
Arch has proven that this lock of a sig line can be done. Then the offending party can't post anywhere without the brand of shame being evident.
Wouldn't be too hard either since there are only 50 or so HOS and Probation list members.
I think that is an excellent idea.
+1
That would be PERFECT!
That was suggested a long time ago... I thought it would make a nice custom title....it didn't seem to fly with the Mods.
It continues to amaze me that the Mods can consistantly pull a pic of a girl in a bathing suit or a slight political comment, but can't help enforce an issue that would actually protect board members.
Not saying that Mods aren't helpful or needed... just a
This has been discussed before. There is a huge difference between maintaining the contents of the boards (removing photos etc) and branding individual users with negative siglines and/or custom titles. Why should CGC put themselves in such a potentially actionable position?
See Michael, at times we actually do think alike . . .
I think you've done a great job in these PL threads POV - I know you worked hard documenting all the rules. You've resisted taking the easy road on some nominations, when opposing the mob was the right thing to do. You always state your reasoning clearly yet you are very open minded when considering the opinions of others.
Registered: 09/14/02
Posts: 23426
Loc: Perv Toy Row, San Francisco, C...
Originally Posted By: divad
Originally Posted By: Povertyrow
Originally Posted By: Bio-Rupp
Originally Posted By: skypinkblu
Originally Posted By: sufunk
Originally Posted By: oakman29
Originally Posted By: Bio-Rupp
Originally Posted By: oakman29
How would we go about locking the thread from the general population,and only five people having access to it? Would we need to ask Arch for moderator status only in the probie thread?
I've said this before... if you're going to involve Arch or Mods, just ask them to LOCK the words "PROBATION LIST" into the sig line of the offender.
Arch has proven that this lock of a sig line can be done. Then the offending party can't post anywhere without the brand of shame being evident.
Wouldn't be too hard either since there are only 50 or so HOS and Probation list members.
I think that is an excellent idea.
+1
That would be PERFECT!
That was suggested a long time ago... I thought it would make a nice custom title....it didn't seem to fly with the Mods.
It continues to amaze me that the Mods can consistantly pull a pic of a girl in a bathing suit or a slight political comment, but can't help enforce an issue that would actually protect board members.
Not saying that Mods aren't helpful or needed... just a
This has been discussed before. There is a huge difference between maintaining the contents of the boards (removing photos etc) and branding individual users with negative siglines and/or custom titles. Why should CGC put themselves in such a potentially actionable position?
See Michael, at times we actually do think alike . . .
I do think you and a few others would be good for the list itself, because having it locked, which is part of the reason, would also prevent all the trash posts that keep littering it.
) it would be sponsored "branding" - not necessarily a liability that the host company would like to incur. 
Although when Sha changed colors earlier on, I though she was changing teams . . . 
