#5654169 - 05/05/1205:16 AMRe: In the beginning...There were expansions...
[Re: Silver Collector]
Doc JoeDoc Joe
FACT if I stop posting, trillions and trillions of transistors would be out of work.
Registered: 12/14/08
Posts: 4860
Loc: Minnesota
Originally Posted By: Silver Collector
Hello, I had noticed the other day that Flash 217, 218, and 219 had been removed from the "Green Lantern (1960) #76-#89". I was directed to this thread. Just my 2 cents, but I liked these comics being part of the set. Of course, one could argue that the title of the set could be more descriptive with their inclusion. These Flash books kept with the theme of Green Lantern/Green Arrow/Neal Adams. I didn't have any of these Flash books in my set, yet. I vote (if there is such a thing here) that they be re-added. Again, just my opinion.
Thanks,
Mike
The titles of sets are not random.
When they say something specific then that's what they mean. People need to think if they are describing a character or the title of a published comic book series.
It's hard to get more specific than green lantern (issues) 76-89; thats what this set is called and the title indicates which books belong in it.
These sets are artificial constructs thus a large amount of flexibility exists, but people keep trying to alter the contents of sets with books that it should be pretty obvious have no place there.
By all means request a set called green lantern 76-89 and flash crossovers if you like, no problem with that.
Cover sets should be just that, if Dave Stevens didn't do it it should not be in the set. And speaking of cover sets, could you add Superman/Batman #4 German Varient to the Micheal Turner Cover Set. And adjust the points for this one. There were only 500 made and I have never seen a high grade copy go for less than $300 Thanks Gemma you are outstanding !
Agreed with ds cover set
Can I have a list of the books that should not be included, please?
Since they each have their own separate sets is it necessary to combine them? Should it be made into a new set for those who only collect one or the other?
#5664587 - 05/09/1202:58 AMRe: In the beginning...There were expansions...
[Re: icculus308win]
icculus308winicculus308win
If you have a dream about out-posting me, you better wake up and apologize.
Registered: 12/21/08
Posts: 2864
Loc: Barrington, IL
Originally Posted By: icculus308win
2) Could Jules Verne's Mysterious Isle (Dell 11/63-1/64) go into the "Movie Classics Dell" Set? Even though it is not technically labeled by CGC as a "Movie Classic?" If not where else could it find a home?
Thank-you Gemma:)
_________________________ Go Cubs Go! Bear Down Chicago Bears!! (*uck Cutler though) Lets Go Hawks!!! Lets Go Hawks!!! Lets Go Hawks!!!
"These should have boards in them - Bloody Savages!" "Don't hit me with them negative waves so early in the morning."
Hello, I had noticed the other day that Flash 217, 218, and 219 had been removed from the "Green Lantern (1960) #76-#89". I was directed to this thread. Just my 2 cents, but I liked these comics being part of the set. Of course, one could argue that the title of the set could be more descriptive with their inclusion. These Flash books kept with the theme of Green Lantern/Green Arrow/Neal Adams. I didn't have any of these Flash books in my set, yet. I vote (if there is such a thing here) that they be re-added. Again, just my opinion.
Thanks,
Mike
The titles of sets are not random.
When they say something specific then that's what they mean. People need to think if they are describing a character or the title of a published comic book series.
It's hard to get more specific than green lantern (issues) 76-89; thats what this set is called and the title indicates which books belong in it.
These sets are artificial constructs thus a large amount of flexibility exists, but people keep trying to alter the contents of sets with books that it should be pretty obvious have no place there.
By all means request a set called green lantern 76-89 and flash crossovers if you like, no problem with that.
There are three other sets for the Green Lantern 1960 series. There is one for issues # 1 - 89, another for #90 - 200 and another of the complete set.
It is easy to see that this set was intended to be the short series by Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams. When the title got cancelled by DC the series continued in Flash 217, 218 & 219. For those collectors who are collecting just the Adams/O'Neil series this set needs to be updated to include the entire series.
And for those who only wants the Green Lantern title then the GL # 1 - 89 would stll work.
#5671417 - 05/11/1202:09 AMRe: In the beginning...There were expansions...
[Re: oceanbert]
Ramses717Ramses717
The Post-man always rings twice. Uhm... ring ring?
Registered: 06/18/10
Posts: 1879
Loc: Texas
Originally Posted By: oceanbert
There are three other sets for the Green Lantern 1960 series. There is one for issues # 1 - 89, another for #90 - 200 and another of the complete set.
It is easy to see that this set was intended to be the short series by Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams. When the title got cancelled by DC the series continued in Flash 217, 218 & 219. For those collectors who are collecting just the Adams/O'Neil series this set needs to be updated to include the entire series.
And for those who only wants the Green Lantern title then the GL # 1 - 89 would stll work.
If an Adams/O'Neal registry set is made including the Flash issues, wouldn't 88 need to be eliminated since it's all reprints?