#1460069 - 11/22/06 04:45 PM
Re: Comment thread for forum guidelines
[Re: nik]
|
Architecht
We apologise again for the fault in the moderation. Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.
It's POSSIBLE that your competitive spirit has displaced your sense of courtesy.
Pedigreed
Registered: 01/25/02
Posts: 5848
Loc: Chicago area
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE NOTICE ON POSTING GUIDELINES
Note that the members of this board are encouraged to POLITELY point out posts that violate the marketplace posting guidelines, and to notify the moderators.
Thread starters: If you disagree that the guidelines have been violated and have reasons, then take it to the discussion thread and hash it out there. But please take the time to read the guidelines.
A probation list for bad transactions is maintained by the community. You are still responsible for your own transactions.
|
|
|
#1460070 - 11/22/06 04:46 PM
Re: Comment thread for forum guidelines
[Re: Architecht]
|
nik
Hellenistically Gifted
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 03/20/03
Posts: 28968
Loc: Southboro, Mass
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1460072 - 11/22/06 04:59 PM
Re: Comment thread for forum guidelines
[Re: Architecht]
|
MutantKeys
Zoinks, Scoob! What do you mean "get a haircut"?
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 05/30/04
Posts: 43475
Loc: New York
|
Sounds good 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1460074 - 11/22/06 05:07 PM
Re: Comment thread for forum guidelines
[Re: Point Five]
|
drbanner
I think all the people repeatedly crying about not getting a custom title should be inducted into the "Crybaby Crew", and forever carry that as their custom title!
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 05/20/02
Posts: 13917
Loc: 3rd rock from the sun
|
Quote:
Quote:
I dont like the part where posts have to start with"WTS:" its too blah 
 I agree.
Also, the part about "threads may not be bumped to the top until a week after they have fallen off of the front page" is a big disappointment. I realize Arch is trying to prevent serial bumping, but a week seems much too long to keep any momentum. Speaking as one of the "little fish" that the guidelines are presumably trying to protect, I would have lost out on most of my sales if this had been in effect before. 
I agree with both sentiments.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1460075 - 11/22/06 05:12 PM
Re: Comment thread for forum guidelines
[Re: drbanner]
|
Pirate
My packages take better vacations than I do
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 25041
Loc: Pirate ESQ
|
I love everything but the bump part. What constitutes a bump? The actual graemlin by the seller or someone coming along with a corny post to shoot it to the top? ON busy days, you could lose the front page in 5 minutes.
_________________________
2007 Nik Grading Contest WINNER  KUDOS THREADLooking to buy Batgirl Special pages by Barry Kitson, ORIGINAL ART
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1460076 - 11/22/06 05:19 PM
Re: Comment thread for forum guidelines
[Re: Architecht]
|
joe_collector
Ok ok. JC Superstar. But only because he martyred his ID.
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 08/21/02
Posts: 34993
Loc: Titan
|
Excellent work Arch, and the only small addition I'd have is to not allow transactions through an outside dealer site or email ordering system.
Sounds logical, but right now, it's allowed under the current rules, assuming no live URL to the site (just a generic "Go to XXX comics and order") is posted.
Otherwise, a HUGE step in the right direction. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1460078 - 11/22/06 05:25 PM
Re: Comment thread for forum guidelines
[Re: Architecht]
|
esquirecomics
TOTAL NEWBIE
Registered: 01/20/05
Posts: 15380
Loc: Washington, D.C.
|
How about that all perceived violations are to be reported to the administrator for action, or to the creator for correction, and that any spams within the thread by forumites attacking the conduct (which, in fact, may turn out to be inaccurate) itself constitutes a rule violation.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: cgcmod6, Architecht, cgcmod5, cgcmod7, cgcmod8, CCGmod0, Barbara T, Matt Nelson, cgcmod9, cgcmod10, cgcmod11, cgcmod12
|
|
