Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
#1500545 - 12/20/06 12:33 PM MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse
WoodenJefferson Offline

I have nothing to add or subtract, I am merely here.

TOTAL NEWBIE


Registered: 12/08/06
Posts: 19238
Loc: Hurtling thru space @ 67,000 m...

The 1959-D Wheat Ears Reverse Cent is one of the most controversial coins to appear on the market in decades. Many experts who have examined the coin are at a loss to explain its existence. Several experts have stated that they believe the coin to be counterfeit, although they are unable to give specific reasons why. On the other hand, the Secret Service has given the coin their stamp of authenticity - on at least two occasions! The coin was scheduled to be sold in Ira & Larry Goldberg Coins & Collectibles, Inc. "The Pre-Long Beach Auction", September 23-24, 2002 (see description below), but the coin was pulled from the auction at the eleventh hour when convicted forger Mark Hofmann claimed to have made the coin. Subsequent investigation failed to confirm this claim and the coin was re-consigned to the Goldberg's "The Benson Collection Part III", February 24-25, 2003, Lot 159. As of February 23, 2003, no major grading service had chosen to certify the coin as genuine.


Another area involves fakes of mint errors. According to Bob Campbell, there are still mint error fakes floating around the Salt Lake City area. Maybe the most famous item claimed by Hofmann is a US 1959-D Wheat Ear Reverse Cent, supposedly found in circulation in 1986. Two times autheticated by the Secret Service, but denied by all grading services. There are a number of reasons to doubt its validity: according to engraver Frank Gasparro, the mint was very concerned about producing such a mule, and therefore was extremely careful during striking; and no such mules showed up in circulation in 1960 during the hunt for small date cents. This piece sold for $48,300 in 2003, and Bob considers it Hofmann's greatest error forgery.

Another (aledged) forgery by Hofmann:
One of his first altered coins was a 1916 US dime with an added D mintmark. The D was added using electroplating, by selectively adding silver in the mintmark area while the surrounding area was masked; pronounced genuine by the Treasury Department. Some doubters question how thoroughly Treasury checked the mintmark, while others who have tried that procedure have not produced good results.




Recourses: www.coinfacts.com
http://www.chicagocoinclub.org/chatter/2006/Mar/
_________________________
Paging Mister Dobalina, Mister Bob Dobalina





Top
Share
#1500546 - 12/20/06 12:54 PM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: WoodenJefferson]
TomB Offline
TOTAL NEWBIE


Registered: 01/28/02
Posts: 11788
I believe the reluctance on the part of the TPGs is driven by liability more than any other factor. Since no discernible die characteristics to match the obverse to a known 1959-D die or the reverse to a known 1958 or before die (most likely 1958 or 1958-D) are available, the TPGs would need to perform analytical techniques such as spectroscopy, x-ray and metal analysis to give an educated guess. If the coin were to be slabbed and sold for an extraordinary amount of money only to be proven fake later on then the TPG in question would be on the hook for a substantial amount of money. In the opinion of the TPGs this is apparently not a good gamble.
_________________________
Tom
Posts are based on experience and are opinion only. Experiences and opinions of others may differ.

Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

Check out my photography and follow me on Facebook


On ebay as ivyleaguecoin

Top
#1500547 - 12/20/06 12:56 PM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: WoodenJefferson]
Dcoin Offline
The Post-man always rings twice. Uhm... ring ring?


Registered: 12/13/06
Posts: 1586
Loc: NYC
Great post... problem is that if it will never be certified as authentic it will never realize its true value. It will forever be a great conversation piece but not a true numismatic rarity.

Dcoin
_________________________
Dave P.

"Grab life by the walls"

Top
#1500548 - 12/20/06 01:25 PM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: TomB]
Hoot Offline
TOTAL NEWBIE


Registered: 02/07/02
Posts: 7451
Loc: Big Sky Country
Quote:

Since no discernible die characteristics to match the obverse to a known 1959-D die or the reverse to a known 1958 or before die (most likely 1958 or 1958-D) are available




This is exactly the problem. Someone with a lot of time on their hands needs to do an analysis on the dies. This would be exceedingly difficult for a modern coin, but for Denver minted coins, there would at least be a place to start - the mint mark. Since mint marks were still being placed by hand punches at the time, this might be one approach to proving authenticity or lack thereof. The obverse and MM would require comparison with several years. The reverse may be discernable in terms of die state and the subtleties of die fatigue evidence, particularly in the wheat ears.

Personally, I can't imagine doing this. The process would be ugly, at best.

As for the spectroscopy, the only things I'd imagine that would reveal would be that the coin is struck, and that it was struck on a genuine planchet, which would not have been tough to get a hold of.

Hoot
_________________________
I beg you to have patience with everything unresolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves, as if they were locked rooms or books written in a very foreign language. Donít search for the answers, which could not be given to you now, because you would not be able to live them. And the point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps then, someday far in the future, you will gradually, without ever noticing it, live your way into the answer. ~Rainer M. Rilke

Signature set: Transitional Pieces of 1836-40

Top
#1500549 - 12/20/06 02:48 PM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: WoodenJefferson]
James_EarlyUS Offline
TOTAL NEWBIE


Registered: 09/12/03
Posts: 15446
Loc: St. Louis, MO
I don't believe certification has even the slightest influence on the value of this coin. It's like an 1804 dollar in that respect. It's not like the grade is of any import, here .

Top
#1500550 - 12/20/06 03:13 PM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: James_EarlyUS]
Dcoin Offline
The Post-man always rings twice. Uhm... ring ring?


Registered: 12/13/06
Posts: 1586
Loc: NYC
I was not referring to grade but rather to its being genuine or fake. This is the difference between rarity and really expensive forgery. Everybody knows the 1804 is genuine (whether restrike or original) and therefore is recognized as a true rarity. There is a good chance this coin will never attain that status.


Dcoin
_________________________
Dave P.

"Grab life by the walls"

Top
#1500551 - 12/21/06 07:02 AM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: Dcoin]
James_EarlyUS Offline
TOTAL NEWBIE


Registered: 09/12/03
Posts: 15446
Loc: St. Louis, MO
Personally, I believe the coin is fake. It may be a very good fake, but nonetheless, I don't believe such a genuine mule was ever produced from within the walls of the Federal mint.

Top
#1500552 - 12/21/06 08:01 AM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: James_EarlyUS]
braddick Offline

First Official Forum Member

FACT if I stop posting, trillions and trillions of transistors would be out of work.


Registered: 01/28/02
Posts: 4828
I agree it was Mark Hofmann who forged the coin.

Top
#1500553 - 12/21/06 08:58 AM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: braddick]
Denver Dave Offline
Collectosaurus Rex


Registered: 06/25/05
Posts: 430

Kind of strange no one can prove it's a fake

Biggest red flag I see is the fact there is only one example, if this were a mint error surly others would surface...

If Mark Hoffmann faked the coin, he sure wasted his god given talent...

Here's a thought, your searching shotgun rolls and find a full roll of mules all in MS65RD or better...

What do you do...?

In this day and age I suspect the first thing would be hiring a Lawyer...
_________________________
Take Care, Dave

Top
#1500554 - 12/21/06 11:01 AM Re: MULE or NO MULE? 1959-D Lincoln Cent with Wheat Ears Reverse [Re: Denver Dave]
Die Varieties Offline
Collectosaurus Rex


Registered: 06/30/05
Posts: 558
"Biggest red flag I see is the fact there is only one example, if this were a mint error surly others would surface..."

There in lies the rub. With many years and all the rolls/bags searched and as far as I'm aware of only the one example -- I have to go with thumbs down.

Billy

Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  ngcmod, dena, Jay Turner, CCGmod0, PaulS., Barbara T, Keith Zaner, ccgmod1, jrich, cgcmod8, ccgmod2 
Hop to:
Boards Information
Please read the
TERMS OF USE - BOARD GUIDELINES
for the rules of moderation on the boards.



Search
The Money Marketplace
Book/Auction Catalog give-away...sort of
by jom
12:33 PM
WTB: 2009 Ultra High Relief Gold Eagle
by Proudtoown
09:34 PM
FS: NGC MS64BN Civil war token.
by agentjim007
03:39 PM
1 cent Morgans also halves and quarters!
by AstroTrain
03:21 PM
Comics Marketplace
DTACOLLECTIBLES.COM-
EC COMICS, KEYS, FIRST LEGION OF SUPERHEROES, X-MEN 3, ETC

by TopNotch
Iron Man #128 CGC 9.6 SS For Sale!!
by GACollectibles
03:33 PM
A fresh arrival from CGC: something for everyone before Christmas!!
by Columbia Comics
02:57 PM
Amazing Spiderman #135-136 SS Stan Lee, Romita, Gerry Conway, FS
by JBhutto
12:58 PM
Advertisements

Generated in 0.038 seconds in which 0.02 seconds were spent on a total of 15 queries. Zlib compression enabled.